Sign Up at luno. The choice between Restricted Stock and Stock Options is dependent upon circumstances and facts. No Reproduction without Prior Authorizations.
While you may not have to pay out any money for an RSU grant, you'll need to pay income tax on its fair market value. Since you are restricted from selling the RSU stock for a certain period, you may wish for the stock option, which requires no income tax until you sell.
At the center of everything we do is a strong commitment to independent research and sharing its profitable discoveries with investors. This dedication to giving investors a trading advantage led to the creation of our proven Zacks Rank stock-rating system.
These returns cover a period from and were examined and attested by Baker Tilly, an independent accounting firm. Visit performance for information about the performance numbers displayed above. Skip to main content. Payment in Stocks As an alternative form of payment, some companies offer employees the option of owning stock in the company.
Stock Options With stock options, you can buy company stock in the future at the price that was current when you received the stock option. Restricted Stock Units Restricted stock units are another form of compensation that may involve the transfer of stocks. Comparison The main difference between an RSU and a stock option is that the former may result in a direct cash outlay, whereas, in the latter case, you get shares.
References 5 The New York Times: Zacks Research is Reported On: Related Questions More Answers Below If left with a choice between being compensated in options versus RSUs, why would an employee ever choose stock options? My company is offering a choice between stock options or RSUs or a mix.
What is the best option? Why can RSUs be more expensive than common stocks? What was Facebook's stock options strike price before the change to RSUs? How does it feel to walk away from unvested stock options or RSUs? Answered Dec 14, Have I made or lost money? If I sold some or all of my shares what else would I do with the cash?
What does the future of the company look like? If the company is listing, why? Is it to raise more capital or to provide an exit for the founders? What are the C-level execs and company directors doing? Buy Bitcoin and Ethereum with Luno. Luno makes it safe and easy to buy, store and learn about cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Sign Up at luno. Answered Dec 3, What are the advantages and disadvantages of RSUs over stock options? The over-simplified, ft. The latter is the same as with traditional stock options what is roughly referred to as vesting schedule. The former usually means your RSUs aren't actually yours until the company IPOs or hits whatever performance condition is defined. Here are some articles my colleagues and I have written that might shed light into your research: This is not advice.
These views are my own. Thank you for your feedback! In startup world, what is preferred way to compensate employees: This is a question, I researched a long time back with an intern, who is now a known professor in economics.
The answer is actually none of these may be an optimal way to offer stock based compensation. We did the research under Black-Scholes model. Here are some assumptions. We assumed no dividend and no taxes etc. We wanted to understand what is the best combination. So we defined a notion of "incentive ratio", i. On the other hand, incentive ratio of options fluctuates over time. If the stock price is deeply underwater, the incentive ratio is just zero depending upon how employee values their options, we used a simplistic model, i.
It has been observed that when the options are too much underwater, many companies redefine the strike price, therefore giving additional later value to the employees. As an example, Google did it and it costed an additional billion dollars to google.
So we decided to look at the expected incentive ratio. We wanted to know what is the best combination which maximizes the expected incentive ratio. Since the incentive ratio and the expectation are linear functions, it means that the optimal value happen at either pure stock award or pure option award. But then many companies used do give the combination. We thought that is paradoxical. It seems it is because the way combination is offered is not optimal, but a way for hedging the future now major companies are moving to stocks and it is quite conservative -- note that stocks have a fixed incentive ratio so no need of repricing which offers additional value to the employees than originally promised.
Now let me offer a different interpretation of a stock. You could consider a stock as an option with the strike price of 0. Another way to combine these two types of options is not by the number, but by the strike price. The question is to find x, so as to maximize the expected incentive ratio. Now the stocks have two more properties, drag, which is assumed to be risk free interest rate and volatility. We were not able to solve the differential equations, so we that basically means the intern simulated it on a computer.
Now depending upon the risk-free interest, and the volatility we found the optimal x. For a low enough risk-free interest, the optimal x was somewhere between 0 and 1. Later on I realized that Google might not have to repriced their options if that is what they had done. Just take down the strike price, to take care of the future fluctuation in the stock price.
The other way is obviously to offer strike price of 0, i. No here is something interesting. If you assume the drag, i. Even if the risk free interest rate is not high, but an employee is willing to bet that the underline stock has much higher drag than the risk free interest rate, then the employee could choose a value of x, to become start-up like rich with established companies too, but gets nothing if the assumption is false just like in startups.
For more senior executives, restricted stock tends to be the preferred method. It positions the recipient for capital gains treatment upon a company sale, but it is subject to vesting to ensure that it is earned.
The major drawback, however, is that it has to be purchased at fair market value in order to avoid income recognition. The greater the company's valuation, the more difficult that will become. For more "rank and file" employees, the preferred method tends to be an option grant. The option will typically be subject to vesting either time or performance based to ensure that it is earned, and it allows the holder to purchase the shares during a fixed period of time at a fixed price.
This essentially permits the option holder to wait for a liquidity event before exercising the option and putting his or her money at risk.
Also, at the time of grant, the option must have an exercise price of no less than fair market value in order to avoid some very nasty tax issues under Section A of the Internal Revenue Code and some similar state laws. Or it may decide to issue both types.
In some cases, the company allows the executive or employees to choose between the two. The decision to be made as to which to use must be done with the following in mind:. Benefits to the grantees and to the company. In the case of ISOs, there is no deduction by the company, assuming no disqualifying dispositions are made. Restricted Stock and RSU: No taxes are assessed to the grantee at grant.
Taxes are assessed when the Restricted Sock vests as they are now transferable or not subject to risk of forfeiture, Section 83 b IRC. The values depend on such factors as the exercise price relative to the current market price, the expected volatility, the expected time to expiration, the expected risk free interest rates, and the expected dividends.
The value of the grants perceived by the grantee, especially with regard to ESOs or SARs may be far different than the value allocated to theoretical costs to the company. This is so because companies tend to under-value the ESOs at grant day, and the expected time to expiration of the ESOs may vary considerably in the estimation of each individual.
There is always the risk that the grantee will not achieve that vesting and therefore never own the granted equity value and lose it all.
Copyright © 2017 · All Rights Reserved · Maine Council of Churches